|
|
Post by Carew Cut on Jan 1, 2011 22:57:35 GMT
Carson wasn't to blame for either goal.
|
|
|
|
Post by WrightyWBA on Jan 1, 2011 22:58:41 GMT
Who was marking tha little mexican prick?
|
|
|
|
Post by Astlebridge on Jan 1, 2011 22:59:36 GMT
How did the first one look? Has Carson landed yet?
|
|
|
|
Post by scuba on Jan 1, 2011 22:59:40 GMT
Agreed. Awful marking though.
|
|
|
|
Post by Removals Van on Jan 1, 2011 23:06:22 GMT
Carson wasn't to blame for either goal. Hernandez stood completely unmarked, right in front of Carson. As a captain, as a goalkeeper, as absolutely anything, why wasn't he screaming that he was left alone: and that's leaving aside the fact that if he EVER took a stride off the line where he shits himself, that was at the very least a dolly punch away in that spot. He is ineffective, and not very good, because he doesn't perform basic goalkeeping tasks. |
|
|
|
Post by Soda Popinski on Jan 1, 2011 23:06:24 GMT
Is it not the goalie's job to make sure everyone is picking their bloke up?
|
|
|
|
Post by richbaggie on Jan 1, 2011 23:07:11 GMT
A ball inside the 6 yard box, inside the posts, is a keepers ball.
He might not have dropped it but he has to be in there trying to claim those otherwise why the fuck is he there?
|
|
secondtimer
played a blider!
We Know Something You Don't Know
Posts: 9,432
|
Post by secondtimer on Jan 1, 2011 23:08:04 GMT
Is it not the goalie's job to make sure everyone is picking their bloke up? Is it the captains ?? |
|
|
|
Post by WrightyWBA on Jan 1, 2011 23:08:34 GMT
Is it not the goalie's job to make sure everyone is picking their bloke up? I thought that as the captains job. oh wait... |
|
|
|
Post by denhaagbaggie on Jan 1, 2011 23:12:31 GMT
I thought that Carson took an age to get down for the first. MOTD confirmed it. I guess he was wrong footed, but i'm not sure how. Carson takes a big part of the blame for the second. He should have come for it and didn't. The ball "should" have been his. Carson was glued to his line, where quite honestly, he isn't much use!
|
|
Elmo
AH! AH! AH!
Can you tell me how to get to fookin Seasame Street eh
Posts: 3,141 
|
Post by Elmo on Jan 1, 2011 23:14:57 GMT
No organisation at corner meant Scharner was left chasing Hernandez, The Unit wondering off when if he stood his position the ball would have hit his head
Loads of mistakes from lots of players there, not only Carson
|
|
|
|
Post by WrightyWBA on Jan 1, 2011 23:19:07 GMT
Is it not the goalie's job to make sure everyone is picking their bloke up? Is it the captains ?? Damn you for saying it first. As the gays on MOTD said, its harsh 2 blame just 1 man. Someone would have been briefed before the game who is marking who, the fact they havent is their own fault. Their not 10 and should be able 2 pick up someone without needed to be shouted at. |
|
|
|
Post by Removals Van on Jan 1, 2011 23:30:10 GMT
Damn you for saying it first. As the gays on MOTD said, its harsh 2 blame just 1 man. Someone would have been briefed before the game who is marking who, the fact they havent is their own fault. Their not 10 and should be able 2 pick up someone without needed to be shouted at. Gays? I thought it was only LAVVRO that was gay. |
|
|
|
Post by Maresca on Jan 1, 2011 23:30:21 GMT
Carson wasn't to blame for either goal. This is already a candidate for the fucking worst post of the year. He had time to walk over and pick the ball up on the first goal but decided not to dive until it'd gone past him. |
|
|
|
Post by supamart on Jan 1, 2011 23:31:28 GMT
A ball inside the 6 yard box, inside the posts, is a keepers ball. He might not have dropped it but he has to be in there trying to claim those otherwise why the fuck is he there? Exactly !! |
|
Elmo
AH! AH! AH!
Can you tell me how to get to fookin Seasame Street eh
Posts: 3,141
|
Post by Elmo on Jan 1, 2011 23:34:08 GMT
Carson wasn't to blame for either goal. This is already a candidate for the fucking worst post of the year. He had time to walk over and pick the ball up on the first goal but decided not to dive until it'd gone past him. +1 |
|
|
|
Post by WrightyWBA on Jan 1, 2011 23:37:26 GMT
This is already a candidate for the fucking worst post of the year. He had time to walk over and pick the ball up on the first goal but decided not to dive until it'd gone past him. +1 I agree tht it seemed to take forever to reach the goal, he did the same with that Balotelli goal few weeks back, dived at the last minute |
|
|
|
Post by boingingbaggie on Jan 1, 2011 23:39:46 GMT
Having just watched it I'm now completely the opposite to you. Whilst the first one might not have been his 'fault' a competent goalie should have saved it, it was hardly a bullet header and his dive was woeful
The 2nd goal can only be his fault, 4 yards out, completely open and with a goalie stuck to his line is a recipie for disaster
He's costing us goals now game after game and needs dropping
On a completely different note.. What was the point of ever spending 1.5 m on a fugging goalie if you NEVER have any intention of playing him when the current incumbent is performing so shit???
We may as well have just kept kiely as back up
|
|
Elmo
AH! AH! AH!
Can you tell me how to get to fookin Seasame Street eh
Posts: 3,141
|
Post by Elmo on Jan 1, 2011 23:40:19 GMT
I agree tht it seemed to take forever to reach the goal, he did the same with that Balotelli goal few weeks back, dived at the last minute He's still diving from that incident you know |
|
|
|
Post by WrightyWBA on Jan 1, 2011 23:44:29 GMT
I agree tht it seemed to take forever to reach the goal, he did the same with that Balotelli goal few weeks back, dived at the last minute He's still diving from that incident you know Loff |
|
|
|
Post by Carew Cut on Jan 1, 2011 23:57:30 GMT
I would agree that he probably could've made the first goal look a little better, though it was a very well positioned header. The real problem with the first goal, was that Rooney was allowed to make the header. His marker (Scharner), was nowhere near him. And Scharner had given away the free kick that started the move with his poor control.
And yet still people think he should play centre half...
As for the 2nd, it's down to The Unit. He is there to cut that ball out, to stop it from reaching the near post. Just like when facing a free kick and trusting the wall to cover part of the goal, Carson has a right to expect The Unit to do his job. It's grossly unfair that people are now slaughtering Carson based on a basic error made by another player.
|
|
|
|
Post by WrightyWBA on Jan 1, 2011 23:59:43 GMT
I would agree that he probably could've made the first goal look a little better, though it was a very well positioned header. The real problem with the first goal, was that Rooney was allowed to make the header. His marker (Scharner), was nowhere near him. And Scharner had given away the free kick that started the move with his poor control. And yet still people think he should play centre half... As for the 2nd, it's down to The Unit. He is there to cut that ball out, to stop it from reaching the near post. Just like when facing a free kick and trusting the wall to cover part of the goal, Carson has a right to expect The Unit to do his job. It's grossly unfair that people are now slaughtering Carson based on a basic error made by another player. +1 Its even more annoying than Hernandez is only about 5'5 |
|
|
|
Post by Statto on Jan 2, 2011 0:00:28 GMT
I would agree that he probably could've made the first goal look a little better, though it was a very well positioned header. The real problem with the first goal, was that Rooney was allowed to make the header. His marker (Scharner), was nowhere near him. And Scharner had given away the free kick that started the move with his poor control. And yet still people think he should play centre half... As for the 2nd, it's down to The Unit. He is there to cut that ball out, to stop it from reaching the near post. Just like when facing a free kick and trusting the wall to cover part of the goal, Carson has a right to expect The Unit to do his job. It's grossly unfair that people are now slaughtering Carson based on a basic error made by another player. This post infringes the site rules as it is not allowed for posters to look objectively at any goal conceded. They are all Scott Carson's fault. Please take note. |
|
|
|
Post by rommel on Jan 2, 2011 0:07:14 GMT
Carson still hasn't hit the ground yet going for that 1st goal.
It's RDMs fault for picking him . and FFS go and put your arm
round Pete's shoulder and tell him what a great player HE IS !!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Maresca on Jan 2, 2011 0:12:25 GMT
I would agree that he probably could've made the first goal look a little better, though it was a very well positioned header. The real problem with the first goal, was that Rooney was allowed to make the header. His marker (Scharner), was nowhere near him. And Scharner had given away the free kick that started the move with his poor control. And yet still people think he should play centre half... As for the 2nd, it's down to The Unit. He is there to cut that ball out, to stop it from reaching the near post. Just like when facing a free kick and trusting the wall to cover part of the goal, Carson has a right to expect The Unit to do his job. It's grossly unfair that people are now slaughtering Carson based on a basic error made by another player. Yawn. I will defend an incompetent player because it makes me look more knowledgable than the rest of you. I have a greater understanding of the game than anyone else. Well in. |
|
|
|
Post by Statto on Jan 2, 2011 0:23:22 GMT
Yawn. I will defend an incompetent player because it makes me look more knowledgable than the rest of you. I have a greater understanding of the game than anyone else. Well in. Yawn. Yes, boring because it's right. |
|
|
|
Post by Maresca on Jan 2, 2011 0:24:38 GMT
Yawn. I will defend an incompetent player because it makes me look more knowledgable than the rest of you. I have a greater understanding of the game than anyone else. Well in. Yawn. Yes, boring because it's right. Like fuck it is. Carson was at fault for both goals. Fair enough he wasn't the only one but he was still at fault nonetheless. |
|
|
|
Post by WrightyWBA on Jan 2, 2011 0:27:08 GMT
Yawn. Yes, boring because it's right. Like fuck it is. Carson was at fault for both goals. Fair enough he wasn't the only one but he was still at fault nonetheless. Yes but if the defence had done their job carson wouldnt of been needed in either instance. |
|
|
|
Post by Maresca on Jan 2, 2011 0:28:37 GMT
Like fuck it is. Carson was at fault for both goals. Fair enough he wasn't the only one but he was still at fault nonetheless. Yes but if the defence had done their job carson wouldnt of been needed in either instance. Let's just not play with a keeper then because the defence should clear everything. If the keeper makes an error then it's the defence's fault so we might as well get rid of him. |
|
|
|
Post by Stayin-up on Jan 2, 2011 0:31:11 GMT
Who was marking tha little mexican prick? U mean the midget pryck? |
|
